the idea of a clean and mandatory way to get the version of the extensions and the xmpp core at the protocol level would be a good idea. versioning should make interoperability testing much easier.
boyd On 8/2/07 3:53 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tomasz Sterna wrote: >> Dnia 02-08-2007, czw o godzinie 13:22 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre >> napisał(a): >>>> The sooner we implement XMPP version dependant features mechanics in >>> our >>>> software, the faster we're be able to move forward. :-) >>> Did you forget the <sarcasm></sarcasm> wrapper? >> >> No I did not. > > OK, sometimes it's hard to know on this list. ;-) > >> One of the things that we're holding the version 1.1 is that we do not >> support version dependant features in software. >> Once we will have that mechanics, we will not be so much against 1.2, >> 1.3 etc. > > Naturally that opens up the question of versioning for XMPP extensions, > too. But I think versioning at the core XMPP layer might be a good first > step. > > Peter
