Boyd Fletcher wrote: > good summary. > > WRT: 19 and 20, by XML object are you referring to the entire document or a > specific element?
I meant XML document. Somehow "XML object" sounded better when I was typing that email (perhaps on the model of "collaborative data object"). > if the later, then the entire document is also required. > For sending of the current state there must be a way to get the current > state without sending all the changes made to get to the point. Correct. > also need: > > - ability to maintain ordering of XML elementd in the document Could you describe that a bit more? > - ability to leverage the permissions from MUC not just run inside muc. Could you describe that a bit more? > - ability to get all the changes to the XML document since a specific > sequence number Right. I'll probably write up a XEP about this so we have it all in one place and so I can categorize the requirements more easily. /psa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
