Dnia 24-08-2007, Pt o godzinie 11:32 +0200, Jérôme Carretero napisał(a): > - I'm having with my co-workers a MUC for internal conversation, and > a shared JID for external contact (like [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) ; there is > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/joe (3), [EMAIL PROTECTED]/jeff (3), > [EMAIL PROTECTED]/otherguy (3) ... and I want that people talking to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for an emergency can be served instantly. > So the guy PMs [EMAIL PROTECTED], and everybody receives it.
Yes. But let's keep your example on. Sally: Help. [multicasted to all 3] Joe: Please describe your problem. [to Sally] Sally: I cannot do XXX. [multicasted to all 3] Jeff: Hi Sally. Please describe your problem. [to Sally] Sally: I already did it. [multicasted to all 3] Joe: Oh fine. So we're done here? [to Sally] Jeff: When? [to Sally] Sally: ??? confused The chatwindow full resource binding was discouraged and clients are expected to send messages to bare JIDs now. So the described situation is going to happen. The helpdesk protocol is invented and implemented with servers and should be used instead of this multicast idea. And for normal usage, the best practices XEP should be created. -- Tomasz Sterna Xiaoka.com http://www.xiaoka.com/
