Dnia 28-08-2007, Wt o godzinie 21:21 +0100, Richard Dobson napisał(a): > Yes but jingle also provides access to ICE and pseudo-tcp so it would > be helpful rather than have the entire file transfer negotiation using > just jingle if it was separated in two so that all the jingle side is > doing is negotiating a generic bytestream that can be then reused by > things like SI, to me this seems like a sensible compromise as there > is no real benefit that I can see of doing the whole thing in jingle > as its just duplicating effort, whereas creating a new bytestream > method is complimentory, anyone else think its a good idea?
Me. :-) +1 for SI/Jingle FT -- Tomasz Sterna Xiaoka.com http://www.xiaoka.com/
