I was thinking we would just add it to XEP-138 instead of writing a new XEP.
I believe some of the folks on the W3 committee are working on an implementation of EXI. On 8/29/07 6:52 PM, "Joe Hildebrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Aug 29, 2007, at 7:00 AM, Fletcher, Boyd C. CIV US USJFCOM JFL > J9935 wrote: > >> > Speaking of compression, I think we should consider adding the w3's >> > efficient xml interchange (exi) support to xep-138. The testing >> > results I've seen for EXI indicate that in many circumstances it is >> > quite a bit better than zlib or tls compression. In addition to >> > better b/w utilization use of exi within the xmpp router could >> > potentially lead to dramatically improved scalability as binary xml >> > is far more efficient to process. > > You should write a XEP, then, that defines the compression method > name, a pointer to the relevant W3C doc, and the XMPP Registrar > Considerations that asks the registrar to add it to the list of > compression methods. > > Off-topic: are there any open source implementations of EXI yet? > > -- > Joe Hildebrand > >
