Le jeudi 30 août 2007, Sergei Golovan a écrit : > I think that it's not a good idea to send disco#info query to a > specific node (concatenated node and ver attributes). Instead, queries > should be sent to peer's JID without any node (as it is specified in > version 1.4 of the XEP).
I fully agree with that. > As for compatibility with clients supporting version 1.3 I would say > that it should be optional and separately described. (If you don't see > algo attribute then send disco#info to a node#ver. If you receive > query to node#ver then reply to it or whatever.) Probably the 'node' > attribute should be made optional too and should be used only if a > client wants to be compatible with 1.3. But if it's desirable then > some degree of compatibility may be required. Correct. Node attribute should maybe become unique for all client. And why should we put the version number in the node ? If it is to substitute the XEP-0092, I think it's the wrong way. (Because it break compatibility with xep-0115 1.3 (if the capabilities doesn't change between versions 1.3.4b to 1.3.4c)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
