Re: [Standards] Shared Editing

[Jonathan Chayce Dickinson]

I realise that, but the /core/ way in which it works seems pretty solid? I mean if Mozilla uses it, they should be getting pretty good results from the concurrent editing that is going on.

Joonas Govenius wrote:

We won't just clone it, we should rather adapt it. But it does seem to work rather well.

On 9/3/07, Jonathan Chayce Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I got an update. Have a look at mercurial, it's designed for this type
of stuff:

<http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/UnderstandingMercurial>

This doesn't seem overly useful because the system is based on pulling
changes; I think we want to push them. In particular, the merging
described in
http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/UnderstandingMercurial#head-75349837835f08689995a0777011390ee5dfd90d
seems to work only because one user pulls first.


Joonas

--
jonathan chayce dickinson
ruby/c# developer

cell:   +27741863698
email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<some profound piece of wisdom>

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature