Dnia 03-10-2007, Śr o godzinie 10:30 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre pisze: > Would anything break if we specified that the receiving entity SHOULD > close the stream and then the initiating entity shall send a new > initial stream header?
I do not know any implementation that handles this closing tag today. The implementations I know would just process the closing tag through TLS layer and fail miserably. So things will break. >From my standpoint we really do not close the stream. The previous state (auth, compression, encryption) is preserved and we just add another layer to the stack. It's more like opening another stream inside a context of previous stream. :-) -- /\_./o__ Tomasz Sterna (/^/(_^^' Xiaoka.com ._.(_.)_ XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
