Lauri Kaila wrote: > 2007/12/1, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> (1) XEP-0155 and XEP-0168 are not normative dependencies in XEP-0166, >> and we mention them only to help implementors. However, I think it would >> be best to move those references to XEP-0208. I am also open to delaying >> the advancement of XEP-0208 until we have more experience with Jingle >> technologies. >> >> (2) XEP-0168 probably is still immature and I think it would be best for >> the Council to delay advancement of this spec. >> >> In a way, the whole resource determination problem is orthogonal to >> XEP-0166. Once you figure out the resource, use XEP-0166. How you figure >> out the resource is up to you. > > I totally agree.
Good. :) I will modify XEP-0166 accordingly. I hope to push out a revised version in the next few days. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
