On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Justin Karneges wrote: > > Is the idea that you should be able to bind to an underlying privacy layer if > it is stronger than what SASL can provide?
Yes, typically for relatively simple SASL password authentication mechanisms (replacements for CRAM-MD5 etc.) that don't provide a security layer. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ SHANNON: SOUTH 6 TO GALE 8, PERHAPS SEVERE GALE 9 LATER. VERY ROUGH BECOMING HIGH. RAIN. MODERATE OR POOR.
