Dave Cridland wrote: > On Thu Dec 13 16:51:35 2007, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> 4. would return an error to the sender (e.g., <recipient-unavailable/>) >> >> > But won't this mean, effectively, that messages and/or data are lost? In > this case, I'm assuming Donald is legitmate - if Donald is deliberately > throttling his c2s link, in order to create a DoS, then we don't care, > of course. > > What we want to do here - I think - is throttle the sender, and only > start to reject stanzas if the throttling is ignored. (Perhaps because > it's unsupported). If Donald has so little bandwidth available, why is he engaging in large data transfers? Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
