> On Jan 19, 2008, at 8:20 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > Well the idea behind the bis drafts is to clarify the core features, > > correct errors, update our usage of technologies like TLS and SASL > > (there are updated RFCs for those now), etc. -- but not to add new > > features.
We added Binding Multiple Resources to RFC3920bis. Let RFC3921bis be no different ;-) > On So, 2008-01-19 at 20:47 -0700, Joe Hildebrand wrote: > As well, removing the namespace would break backwards-compatibility, > which we've been bending over backwards to avoid. As if XEP-0115 redux won't break it? ;-) -- /\_./o__ Tomasz Sterna (/^/(_^^' http://www.xiaoka.com/ ._.(_.)_ im:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
