Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
Joe Hildebrand wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
urn:xmpp:tmp:foo
+1. Love it.
Yeah, I wanted to suggest something like this, too.
It makes the XEP Editor's life much easier when a spec advances to
Draft:
s/urn:xmpp:tmp/urn:xmpp/g
And I'm +1 to anything that makes the XEP Editor's life easier...
I also like this idea, though my one suggestion from a code standpoint
is that if it's 'urn:xmpp:foo:tmp' you can write code to watch
for :tmp on the end of namespaces and handle things cleanly (and with
less code!) during the transitional period between EXPERIMENTAL and
DRAFT status specifications.
That said, I know urn:xmpp:tmp:foo is a more strictly 'proper'
hierarchy, so I don't particularly care about the order that much.
So +1 in general, with one offhanded comment. :)
--
Rachel Blackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trillian Messenger - http://www.trillianastra.com/
