+1 for the fast reconnect
On 2/14/08 3:08 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave Cridland wrote: > >> I'm aware that there are several mobile client developers present - if >> there's any good to be found here, a concrete proposal for mobile XMPP >> would be an excellent step forward. > > Sounds like a good topic of discussion at the devcon next week. > >> I'm assuming that XEP-0138, >> XEP-0198, and probably some sort of roster optimization would all be >> useful, for example, but best practises for servers aiming to optimize >> for mobile clients (perhaps by buffering the initial presence surge to >> gain better compression, for example) would be useful too. > > Here's a list of things we might talk about: > > 1. Recommendations regarding when to use the TCP binding and when to use > the HTTP binding (BOSH). > > 2. Compression via TLS or XEP-0138 (use it!). Also binary XML as a > compression mechanism. > > 3. Fast reconnect to avoid TLS+SASL+resource-binding packets. > > 4. ETags for roster-get (see XEP-0150, let's resurrect that). > > 5. Advisability of presence-only connections (no roster-get, just send > presence and whatever you receive is nice). > > Anything else? > > Peter
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
