its the later (2) since we don¹t really cover in the spec how to render the whiteboard other than specifying the SVG compliance version. However in SVG they (1 & 2) are essentially the same thing.
since there will always be interpretation issues with specifications the only way to verify the other clients are working correctly would be to develop a set of test whiteboards and make someone the reference implementation for comparison. On 3/10/08 5:12 PM, "Dave Cridland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon Mar 10 21:03:52 2008, Fletcher, Boyd C. CIV US USJFCOM JFL > J9935 wrote: >> > we send it as a series of whiteboard commands to draw the >> > whiteboard in >> > band. > > Sorry, there's two things you may mean here, and the difference is > crucial. Do you mean: > > 1) We send commands to the other party such that they have a visually > equivalent whiteboard document. > > 2) We send commands to the other party such that they have an > identical chunk of XML to render as a whiteboard document. > > I'd like to state for the record that I have no preference as to the > right thing here. > > Dave. > -- > Dave Cridland - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/ > - http://dave.cridland.net/ > Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade >
