On Mon Mar 17 15:22:28 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Pedro Melo wrote:
> Lets not abuse the meaning of <message> just because we like their
> network properties, like we abused <presence> in the past because
it
> broadcasts well.
+1.
Absolutely. So I'm looking forward to seeing the update to XEP-0060
which changes PubSub pushes from being <message/> to <iq/>, in (for
example) section 7.1.2.1.
Or, alternately, could someone explain to me why the use of
<message/> stanzas for the 7.1.2.1 case is not "abuse", whereas would
be. Looks to me like they're the same use-case.
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
