Pedro Melo wrote: <snip/>
> Yes, pubsub and muc are the big > winners for this, and again, I think we should drop the complex hash > generation, or at least drop the coupling with the recipients list. Will do. >>> The roster at the remote host could be used as the distribution list, no >>> need for costly updates. Just reverse-query the roster if your DB system >>> provides that (easy for SQL-based rosters, not as simple for LDAP-based >>> ones). >> >> Rosters can get out of sync. The roster at the remote host is not >> necessarily to be trusted. > > Yes, true. But keeping the rosters in sync might be a worthy goal, > probably for a new XEP. A small extension to the initial probe, with the > current status... Anyway, off-topic in this thread. Yes, separate problem, but interesting. New thread, please. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
