Alexey Melnikov pisze:
Ralph Meijer wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 15:16 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Evan Schoenberg of the Adium project pinged offlist regarding the proper
behavior for a client to follow if SASL authentication fails using one
mechanism but other mechanisms are available.
[..]
If one mechanism fails with <not-authorized/>, why would another one
succeed, exactly?
Because different mechanisms might be using different authentication
databases. For example DIGEST-MD5 and GSSAPI.
Is it usually possible for the server to know that failure was caused by
using wrong method? If yes, maybe it would be worth adding a different
error for this case?
--
Maciek
xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
