Fabio Forno wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Besides Justin's observation, which is correct, which are the possible > problems of BOSH for moobiles? > I can just think of one, bandwidth due to the additional HTTP headers > and the <body/> bag. If so it's more reasonable defining some "binary" > (no joke intended... ;)) headers containing contenght length, sid and > rid, than adding incredible complexity by switching transports. We > would lose the ability of passing through web servers, but I don't > think that specialized BBOSH (Binary BBOSH) would be a problem, if > the real issue is bandwidth. Another possible optimization could be > allowing compression on the raw sockets in which we pipeline HTTP > requests, thus compressing headers too (that is what normally happens > with HTTPS...).
Right. I think we wait to gather some "lessons learned" once we have BOSH deployed more widely, then figure out which problems need to be solved (if any). Iteration is our friend. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
