On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Luis Peralta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Overall I like this XEP. What I missed are more possible status > values for the commands. Being in execution and completed is way too > simple for some applications. The initial state after submitting a > command would be 'accepted' and letting the client know that it is in > fact sending commands to a batch service. IMO, the state diagram > should something like: accepted -> executing -> completed, even if in > the current spec 'executing' means both things. > > I would also explicitly refer the possibility of canceling a > running command by using xep-50 'cancel' action. > > +1 for this XEP.
I think that we can reach what you say by allowing any value in the type attribute of the x child -- Fabio Forno, Ph.D. Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com jabber id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
