Alexander Tsvyashchenko wrote: > > Hello All, > > Quoting Alexey Melnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>>> In section 4.2: >>>>> Note: The content of <message/> elements that have different thread >>>>> IDs SHOULD be archived in separate collections. >>>>> >>>> Is this a requirement on the client or on the server? >>> I think it is a client requirement. >> Then don't use passive voice, e.g. >> >> Note: The client SHOULD archive the content of <message/> elements that >> have different thread >> IDs in separate collections. > > As 4.2 is "general description" of collections requirements and behavior > I would say this requirement is both for client and server depending on > archiving scenario, no? > > If the auto-archiving is activated - this is certainly server-side > behavior, it is covered by the previous discussion we had on this list > related to <thread> treatment. > > If manual archiving is used - then it's indeed client's task to handle > that correctly.
That seems sensible to me. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
