Le Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:19:20 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Alban Crequy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Shared XML Editing (SXE) has some <message> stanza that may be > > stored by the Jabber server if the contact is offline. > > http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sxe.html > > > > The example 9 is: > > <message > > from='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/castle' > > to='[EMAIL PROTECTED]/castle'> > > <sxe xmlns='urn:xmpp:tmp:sxe' id='e' session='851ba2'> > > <connect/> > > </sxe> > > </message> > > > > It sounds to me undesirable to store this message offline for later > > delivery. The protocol does not specify if we should use transient > > messages as defined by XEP-0079: > > http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0079.html#examples-transient > > Good point. Expiring such messages using XEP-0079 would make sense. I forget another similar problem if SXE uses a MUC chat room. Some MUC implementations send a short history to newcomers. Even if the contact is online, the newcomers should not get from the past, when they were not in the membership session. I don't know whether XEP-0079 can be used in this case. Also, which servers currently implement transient messages from XEP-0079? It is not mandatory in XMPP Core and XEP-0228 says it only requires XMPP Core (section 2.2) if I understand the section correctly. > BTW, I've been in contact with a number of shared editing teams > outside the Jabber universe lately and they are interested in > discussing this topic in a more focused way, so I might start a small > discussion list about it soon (similar to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list). > In fact I might also start a list for web services discussions, > related to the IO Data proposal. I would be interested to follow discussions about shared edition. -- Alban
