I don't feel strongly about this one way or the other, but I don't think there's anything wrong with adding things "ahead of time", even if they never happen. Why? Because if someone DOES write a skype transport in the future, they can refer to this document and know what to call it, instead of having to pick something arbitrary and then maybe getting fussed at for "picking the wrong thing". ;)
Daniel On 5/25/08 11:15 AM, "Michal 'vorner' Vaner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 01:47:16AM +0200, Magnus Henoch wrote: >> Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Following up on a discussion from the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, I propose >>> the following additions to the "gateway" category in the Service >>> Discovery Identities registry [1]... >> >> How about >> >> <type> >> <name>skype</name> >> <desc>Gateway to Skype</desc> >> <doc>N/A</doc> >> </type> >> >> ? Not that it is likely to appear any time soon, but I'm still dreaming :) > > AFAIK such thing is not technically possible at the moment. Wouldn't be > better to add it when it is needed or at last possible? > > With regards
