On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm pretty happy with the way we previously used RECOMMENDED, I think >> it's a good heads-up that it'll be required the following year. > Except that sometimes it may not be required, in which case the > RECOMMENDED is a false alarm. An example might be XEP-0155 in 2008, > which we expected to lead into ESessions as REQUIRED for 2009 in some > suite (which now seems unlikely).
Sure, I'm happy with that as a reason not to do it again :) /K
