Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Therefore I think the content-replace action is unnecessary in XEP-0176 > (since nomination in the Jingle ICE-UDP transport will also occur over > STUN and does not need to happen in the signalling channel). > > Unless there are objections, I will update XEP-0176 accordingly (a usage > inherited by some of the examples in XEP-0167 and XEP-0180, which will > be harmonized with the modified XEP-0176).
+1 from me. My gut feeling is that content-replace is more of a content apocalypse in terms of implementations. I don't think it's reasonable to expect people to have to diff content descriptions and transports in normal operation - it should have a similar semantic/behaviour as content-remove and content-add delivered simultaneously. > Peter Regards, Rob
