On 05/30/2008 12:14 PM, Tim Julien wrote: > One of the first things I'm going to want to do is add ice-udp (we have > a reliable UDP impl) as a transport
Isn't reliable UDP different from UDP? Or would you just negotiate ice-udp and if your UDP stack provides reliable UDP that would just fall out from the negotiation? > (and ice-tcp when we get that spec). Yes, we need to define that one. It should be pretty straightforward. > Do you envision those negotiations occurring after session-accept, like > Socks5 and IBB in this spec, or before session-accept like in jingle > audio / video over RTP? Probably before, since they would function just like ICE in the voice and video examples (start sending candidates even before you receive the session-accept). /psa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
