Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
To make my life easier, something could be added to XEP-0166 saying that
clients supporting Jingle should support XEP-0155, or even something
similar to XEP-0155 but much lighter weight.
I'm all ears. :)
I'm going to go with supporting XEP-0155, if the client wants to be able
to accept Jingle sessions from those with which it is not sharing
presence. The initiator should then send a message to initiate the
session, with 'presence' and 'service-discovery' fields, each of which
only have the option 'must'. The client can then accept this XEP-0155
session silently, and offer the user the usual notification of an
incoming Jingle session, thereby having leaked presence, or have the
user explicitly accept the XEP-0155 session, and then also accept the
Jingle session which follows, in order to only bother the user once.
Which of these behaviours (or the alternative, rejecting the XEP-0155
session) is up to the client/user.
--
Paul
