On 06/05/2008 12:11 PM, Maciek Niedzielski wrote: > Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 06/15/2007 4:46 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: >>> First off, Ian's point 4 above seems to be on the mark - we don't care >>> if the hops were encrypted when we asked, we care if they're >>> encrypted now. >> I hate to suggest this because people in the badattitude room will >> snicker at me (you know who you are!), but I suppose we could use PEP >> for this... :P > That's my line :)
Yeah yeah yeah. :P In fact I think it's better to use presence for this use case! Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
