"Olivier Crête" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
That's what I would have hoped/expected. Although that poses another
interesting situation. In your example, either of those streams could be
associated with the audio, as opposed to a completely separate video
stream.
So, lets say we combine your example, with also sending a auxiliary
audio/video stream (let's say, we're streaming a local multimedia file
that's a training video). How would we associate the speaker's voice
stream
with the two in-room video views, and the training video's audio with the
video? I realize the is quite an elaborate scenario, but at least in
terms
of protocol, we should be able to express it.
Imho, if you have multiple audio/video inputs, they should all be
synchronized. If you want to have "semantic" associations, then you
should probably put something meaningful in the "name" attribute and
have the application do the magic.
Sounds reasonable. Thanks.
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Collabora Ltd
