On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:21:43 +0200 "Sylvain Mundialco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. > > Can I have more clarity on these: > > We are implementing jingle and all is going all but the configuration > NAT/Firewall for both peer is not working. I'm thinking to use relayed > candidate but I know that there is a way of punching hole in > Nat/Firewall. > > 1) Is it the possible to use the UDP firewall punching hole technique > of waiting the NAT to map the inbound and outbound IP to allow > comunication This is more of a question for your network/firewall administrator, not for XMPP people. For the XMPP part, refer to *XEP-0176: Jingle ICE-UDP Transport Method* > 2) when should we use relay candidate in jingle negotiation. You should generally avoid it. > 3) how with jingle can we get a usable pair of candidates behind > firewall and NAT. I believe it's answered in (1). > Sylvain. -- Web: http://www.pavlix.net/ Jabber & Mail: pavlix(at)pavlix.net OpenID: pavlix.net
