Maciek Niedzielski wrote:
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:I like the part that only client/* should be interpreted as IM-capable resources, but I don't know if that is too strict.That's probably too strict. At the least I think we'd say that the following identities are IM-capable:account/* client/*I always thought these two are independent - account/* defines... account, client/* describes particular connection. So for example, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is account/registered, [EMAIL PROTECTED]/calendar is automation/bot and [EMAIL PROTECTED]/chat is client/pc (yes, I know resources ids are supposed to be opaque, but it was easier to explain this way).
IMHO you'd get account/* from a bare JID and client/* from a full JID. /psa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
