Pavel Simerda wrote:
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:36:12 -0600 Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Pavel Simerda wrote:URL: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0231.htmlThat's it :).Super. So now I think we need to issue a second Last Call on XEP-0231, XEP-0221, and XEP-0158, because they have changed quite a bit since the previous Last Call. And I think now XEP-0231 and XEP-0221 will be more palatable to Council member Ralph Meijer, who did not like the inclusion of binary data in x:data forms. /psaBtw, I had to lookup 'palatable in a dictionary :). If he'll be more content with it, it's only good, it's a pity I didn't see any of his comments or concerns.
In one of the recent XMPP Council meetings he expressed a vague discomfort about XEP-0221 because he didn't think that it was right to include the binary data directly in an x:data form, so I think he may prefer our "bits of binary" approach.
/psa
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
