On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has any MUC implementation coded in support for the "unique room name > request" feature described in Section 10.1.4 of XEP-0045? I think this > feature is unnecessary and (in the interest of simplification) I would like > to remove it from XEP-0045.
Without checking, that was in the spec for converting the chat to muc case. I don't see the harm in leaving it there, but I think it'll come down to another argument about the impossibility of collisions on a guid. /K
