On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 02:52:50 +0100 "Matthew Wild" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Peter Saint-Andre > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Pavel Simerda wrote: > >> > >> Ok, just... couldn't this be at least partially automated (not to > >> have the sure check himself)? If it's not possible, never mind. > > > > Sure it could. I'm not sure if we really need that, given that > > members-only rooms are relatively uncommon, but we could presumably > > define a data form or ad-hoc command for the automated flow if we > > really need to. > > > > I'm leaning toward crossing that bridge when we come to it. My reason > for bringing invite-only rooms was not to suggest they should be done, > just that this protocol takes away the possibility to implement them > (and it happens to be something I was thinking about a couple of weeks > ago). We don't have invite-only rooms, but IRC doesn't have > members-only rooms. > > I can't think of many cases an invite-only room would be called for, > unless it is an admin doing the inviting, in which case it is easy to > add invitees to the member list. That, or just use a password, as > exampled in this XEP. But this must apparently by written by the inviting user. > Matthew. -- Web: http://www.pavlix.net/ Jabber & Mail: pavlix(at)pavlix.net OpenID: pavlix.net
