On Mon Sep 29 18:47:56 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Dave Cridland wrote:
> XMPP does already have a technology in the
> Experimental stage, XEP-0198, which is not yet deployed anywhere
(but
> if PSA updates the namespace to something stable, I might
implement
> it).
I'll get right on that, boss! I've been hoping that my esteemed
co-authors (and any interested others) would send me feedback on it,
since it's in a pretty raw state. I'll read it over here soon, too.
Mea Culpa.
I read it, it looks good, and I was going to implement it as an
amusing project until I realised I couldn't stick it in our release
with a :tmp: namespace, hence all that stuff...
I may find stuff when I get around to implementing it, of course, but
at a glance, it looks generally good. My only real worry was the
namespace declaration at the top-level, because in our
implementation, that will trigger a slower processing of XML in case
that's used inside stanzas - teaching our implementation what it
means, even if we don't implement it, will cure it, but I wonder if
we can avoid that somehow.
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
