On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 11:33:46 +0200 Jonathan Schleifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you get a conflict, you can continue and replace the old resource. > > IIRC, with the current RFC, it's undefined what the server does > then, but most replace it. This should be clearified IMO so that the > RFC I'm very much for a clarification that leads to a reliable service (at least reliable in the sense that the user knows when to re-send stuff, even better, if the client does it for him). This sort of works now with or without ACKs but will break with random resources unless there is a way to avoid. Pavel -- Pavel Šimerda Freelancer v oblasti počítačových sítí, komunikace a bezpečnosti Web: http://www.pavlix.net/ Jabber & Mail: pavlix(at)pavlix.net OpenID: pavlix.net
