On Oct 7, 2008, at 12:29 PM, Pavel Simerda wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 19:07:24 +0100
Pedro Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 5:27 PM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Ok, I can understand your suggestions now. However, you're missing
one point: What advantage do we get by a resource that has no
meaing? IMO, nothing. A static resource just makes it easier for
everyone, IMO. Replacing the connection, etc.
No it does not, because you don't want a connection replaced. you
want a controlled take-over of an old session. You want a new
connection to arrive and tell the server "Hey, I'm session-ID X and
I want to take over it".
Hmm, you helped me to understand the case. Do we have a way to at
least
specify the old session-ID?
XEP-0198, section 6, example 12. (http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0198.html#example-12
)
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use XMPP!
