Hi,
On Oct 7, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Pavel Simerda wrote:
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 19:08:55 +0100
Pedro Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 6:45 PM, Remko Tronçon wrote:
However, that's orthogonal to the original point: If you ask for a
specific resource, I assume you know what you're doing, and the
server should respect that. I think that using some kind of micro
id for resource name is the easiest and best way to avoid the
reconnection problems, and in the mean time avoid the problem with
multiple resources kicking each other out (just because the user
happened to name his location the same).
+1.
Servers should respect the will of the clients here IMHO. I was just
arguing for us to move forward :).
Best regards,
Okay, so you just think servers should respect it for now... but
clients should slowly move out of it and use the names instead of
resource strings.
Yes.
We should not break existing clients if at all possible.
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use XMPP!
