1. we implemented the MUSTs in TransVerse 2. nope 3. all-in-all the spec is pretty thorough and straightforward.
On 10/13/08 4:45 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In its meeting last week, the XMPP Council agreed to issue a "Call for > Experience" regarding XEP-0085: Chat State Notifications, in preparation > for perhaps advancing this specification from Draft to Final in the > XSF's standards process. To help the Council decide whether this XEP is > ready to advance to a status of Final, the Council would like to gather > the following information: > > 1. Who has implemented XEP-0085? Please note that the protocol must > implemented in at least two separate codebases. > > 2. Have developers experienced any problems with the protocol as defined > in XEP-0085? If so, please describe the problems and, if possible, > suggested solutions. > > 3. Is the text of XEP-0085 clear and unambiguous? Are more examples > necessary? Is the conformance language (MAY/SHOULD/MUST) appropriate? > Have developers found the text confusing at all? Please describe any > suggestions you have for improving the text. > > If you have any comments on this XEP, please provide them by the close > of business on Friday, October 31, 2008. After the Call for Experience, > this XEP might undergo revisions to address feedback received, after > which it will be presented to the XMPP Council for voting to a status of > Final. > > You can review the XEP here: > > http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0085.html > > Please send all feedback to the <[email protected]> list. > > Thanks! > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > >
