My errata was for RFC3921, at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3921.txt : IM and Presence. As I mentioned, the draft copy has already corrected the problem, but I just mentioned it in case you want to fix the non-draft copies until the draft one is ready.

Brett

Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Brett Zamir wrote:
Sorry, was relying on the subject line--IM spec...

That is, draft-saintandre-rfc3921bis?





Reply via email to