Remko Tronçon wrote: >> I appreciate that this is almost inexcusably trivial, but bear with me. > > I say, let's put these hip state-of the art 4-color (or more!) > displays finally to work! > > Slightly related, I once wrote up a script that would generate a graph > of all XEP dependencies, and warn you about XEPs in draft state > depending on XEPs in experimental state (and other relations that > aren't allowed). The main flaw was that some XEPs refer to XEPs in > sentences like "This XEP replaces XEP xxx", in which case the > dependency *is* allowed. This could be solved by adding exceptions, or > adding extra <replaces> sections to XEPs, ..., but I didn't really > bother. Maybe a tool like that could also be an addition to our XEP > consistency checking?
Don't we have a <supersedes/> element for this purpose? Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
