On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Rv, Srivatsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This XEP is quite useful for us. Do we have any replacement for it?
Does that mean that you have an implementation of it? /K
- [Standards] Deprecate XEP-0013 (Flexible Offline Message... Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [Standards] Deprecate XEP-0013 (Flexible Offlin... Matthias Wimmer
- Re: [Standards] Deprecate XEP-0013 (Flexible Offlin... Rv, Srivatsa
- Re: [Standards] Deprecate XEP-0013 (Flexible Of... Kevin Smith
- Re: [Standards] Deprecate XEP-0013 (Flexibl... Matthias Wimmer
- Re: [Standards] Deprecate XEP-0013 (Fle... Rv, Srivatsa
- Re: [Standards] Deprecate XEP-0013... Kevin Smith
- Re: [Standards] Deprecate XEP-... Rv, Srivatsa
- Re: [Standards] Deprecate XEP-... Peter Saint-Andre
- [Standards] XEP - 0060 - Multiple ... Rv, Srivatsa
- Re: [Standards] Deprecate XEP-0013 (Flexible Offlin... Waqas Hussain
- Re: [Standards] Deprecate XEP-0013 (Flexible Of... Matthias Wimmer
- Re: [Standards] Deprecate XEP-0013 (Flexible Of... Jakob Schroeter
