Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > Am 02.12.2008 um 21:55 schrieb Joe Hildebrand: > >> Hopefully, adding the XEP-146 interaction section will make this more >> clear. If we think this important to do without changing presence, we >> can either reuse XEP-85 "gone", or add a new state of "moved" that is >> an unlock hint. > > Maybe we want threads in the core so we can have threads and move them?
We have threads in RFC 3921 but no one really / fully implements them. I think that XEP-0085 <gone/> is fine as a hint to unlock and send to the bare JID again. /psa
