Stephan Maka wrote: > My concern with Jingle is its use of <iq/> stanzas: a > caller/sender/initiator always has to known the full JID of the > recipient. Is there any way to use <message/>s? The XEP doesn't mention > it. This is what is problematic with the current file-transfer standard.
We recently discussed that topic in this thread: http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/jingle/2008-December/000284.html BTW all the Last Call discussion for Jingle seems to be happening on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. I don't really mind that -- at least we're getting lots of good feedback -- but folks on this list may want to subscribe to the Jingle list if they're interested: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jingle /psa
