Justin Karneges wrote: > On Thursday 19 February 2009 18:47:28 Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> As promised at the XMPP Summit, I've been working on some revisions to >> XEP-0047 (In-Band Bytestreams). The changes consist of clarifying packet >> processing and error handling, adding more examples, recommending IQs >> over messages, correcting the schemas, etc. You can review the changes >> in process here: >> >> http://xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0047-1.2.html > > Nice modernization. :)
Heh, thanks. > There's no explanation about how to use <message>. It looks like the example > usage was removed. Yes, I think we at least need to document that, even if we don't encourage it. I'll add it back, perhaps in a separate section. > "If enabled by the application that uses IBB, the parties MAY negotiate > multiple SessionIDs for the same bytestream, however such methods are out of > scope for this specification." Would these really be multiple sessionIDs for > the same bytestream, or simply multiple bytestreams? I get that this text is > to allow/warn for XEP-261, but I'm not sure if it is right or needed. Hmm. If we consider a bytestream to be defined as a serious of data packets that all use the same sid, then I think these would in fact be separate bytestreams. Will fix. > Also, some typos: > "Because IBB provides a generic bytestream, so its usage is open-ended." > "(which SHOULD math the NMTOKEN datatype)" Will fix. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
