FYI. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Council] meeting minutes, 2009-02-25 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:29:56 -0700 From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> Reply-To: XMPP Council <[email protected]> To: XMPP Council <[email protected]>
Results of the XMPP Council meeting held 2009-02-25... Agenda: http://xmpp.org/council/agendas/2009-02-25.html Log: http://logs.jabber.org/[email protected]/2009-02-25.html Scribe: Peter Saint-Andre 0. Roll call Present: Dave Cridland, Ralph Meijer, Peter Saint-Andre, Kevin Smith. Absent: Jack Moffitt. Quorum achieved. 1. Agenda bashing None. 2. Use of ZRTP in Jingle RTP Sessions Accept for publication? No objections. 3. XEP-0047: In-Band Bytestreams (IBB) Approve version 1.2? Consensus to vote on this next week to allow more time for review. 4. XMPP BOF / WG The Council discussed which topics might be appropriate for an XMPP WG at the IETF (if approved). Rough consensus on the following: a. rfc3920bis, including work on stringprep and internationalized domain names b. rfc3921bis, probably including: - roster versioning (XEP-0237) - roster "views" (selective get by roster group -- I still need to write up a proposal about this) c. server dialback d. end-to-end encryption and certificate management, that is: http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-meyer-xmpp-e2e-encryption-00.html http://xmpp.org/internet-drafts/draft-meyer-xmpp-sasl-cert-management-00.html (those are not yet submitted) That list does not include an Internet-Draft version of XEP-0198. The relevant criterion is that the selected topics can benefit from IETF review, especially security review, whereas the stream management and stanza acknowledgements work is at the core streaming level but can benefit more from the XMPP expertise at the XSF and less from the general Internet expertise at the IETF. That list also does not include work on SIP-XMPP interworking, because it wasn't clear to the Council whether that is best structured in an XMPP WG, in a separate WG, or as individual submissions as currently being pursued (the draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-* series). The Council defers to the IETF on this matter. Also not on that list is BOSH (XEP-0124 + XEP-0206) because that topic will primarily be discussed in the AppArea meeting, not the XMPP BOF. The Council will probably discuss this matter further after IETF 74 (e.g., possible technical contributions if the IETF decides to pursue work on bidirectional data streaming over HTTP). 5. GSoC Reluctant consensus not to participate in GSoC 2009 because it is the sense of the Council that right now there are not enough active open-source projects that could provide good mentoring opportunities for students. 6. Any other business? None. 7. Next meeting. Wednesday, March 4 @ 20:00 UTC, see http://xmpp.org/xsf/XSF.ics Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
