On 11/30/08 12:14 AM, Brett Zamir wrote: > Ralph Meijer wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 07:26:53PM -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> >>>> [..] >>>> >>>> The Data Forms schema for 'field' would indicate that <value/> instances >>>> must come before any <option/> instances... >>>> >>> Ah, I see. I'll look into fixing that tomorrow. >>> >> >> Did we really want to mandate a specific order? That doesn't seem >> necessary to me. >> > Even if you don't mandate a specific order, the Data Forms schema still > needs to be fixed, since by using <xs:sequence>, it is indicating that > <value/> comes before <option/>. I believe you will need to use <xs:all> > here in some manner if you want to allow any order...
Yes "in some manner". Have you done any research on xs:all? It is defined in such a way as to be essentially unusable. Repeat after me: the schemas are non-normative. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
