--- On Sat, 11/4/09, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Standards] Inconsistent Subscriptions in XMPP
> To: "XMPP Standards" <[email protected]>
> Date: Saturday, 11 April, 2009, 4:04 AM
> On 4/1/09 12:07 PM, Mridul
> Muralidharan wrote:
> >
> > If I recall right, probe can be sent to a full jid in
> case a directed
> > presence was received from it in the past - and the
> behavior would be
> > different (return last presence stanza sent iirc). Has
> that behavior
> > changed or is the description below only for bare
> jid's ?
>
> You can probe anything you want. :)
I should have clarified better.
Assume that there is mutual subscription between userA and userB.
Support we have :
userA has session us...@domain/resA
userB has session us...@domain/resB1
userB has session us...@domain/resB2
After presence has been exchanged, suppose userA blocks userB (or all users) -
so an unavailable presence is sent to userB's resources.
Subsequent to that, suppose userA sends available to one of the resources, say
- us...@domain/resB1
Now, iirc, if resB2 probes, userA's server must return unavailable.
But if resB1 probes, userA's server must return the last directed presence sent
(subsequent to unavailable).
We could replace userB with muc or any other component in the above.
IIRC this was a usecase discussed quite a while back - was it removed ?
If not, my query was, how does it interact with this list below related to
probes, etc.
Thanks,
Mridul
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
>
>
Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to
http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
