2009/4/17 Leonid Evdokimov <[email protected]>: > Jiří Zárevúcký wrote: >> I guess the only "issue" now is the unneeded restriction you added to >> the SVN based on my incorrect feedback. I mean the part "The client >> MUST NOT process any of the interim roster pushes until...". I think >> you can safely remove it again, as the reason for the change was >> proven invalid. > > No, that's quite valid restriction. Client MAY cache some roster pushes > to resume operation from the middle of "transaction" in case of broken > connection, but it MUST NOT bump it's internal roster version until it > gets the full "transaction" of pushes. >
Ok, that seems like a retelling of the restriction. What is the reason for it? The reason I posted was invalid. Do you know of some other way it could negatively affect the retrieval?
