On Apr 27, 2009, at 10:41 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 4/24/09 5:27 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Dave Cridland <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Thu Apr 23 19:30:29 2009, Matthew Wild wrote:
We would need to decide what to do where we currently set ver='0'
though.
We just need to stick with some ver value which is special. An
empty string
works.
I'm happy with that.
So do we have consensus on the following?
(1) 'ver' is opaque
(2) empty 'ver' means bootstrap
+1 from me. Sane, and simple.
Best regards,
Peter
- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkn2JoEACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyNSgCgy72tTMlglGIkUn0H5Y1B54Ij
AbQAoIPpy1TfQ9GxW49swOsnidYOwReC
=w8O+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: [email protected]
Use XMPP!
